How Raising Conforming Mortgage Limits Would Impact California Real Estate

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two housing financemore than 30-40% of their gross income on housing.
companies that have the implicit backing of the UnitedAs such, any drop in rates would yield more buying
States government, presently limit the mortgages theypower for each buyer that was taking out a loan. With
buy in the lower 48 states to a maximum size ofa lower interest rate, a person can pay more for a
$417,000. Alaska and Hawaii loans can be as high ashouse yet keep the same monthly payment. Giving
$625,500. They also have a number of otherbuyers and current homeowners who want to
requirements such as documented income,refinance the access to lower cost capital will serve
employment verification, and many others. A loan thatas an offsetting factor to downward price forces such
does not meet the strict guidelines is considered to beas too much supply, higher levels of foreclosures, or
non-conforming and is not eligible to be purchased byhome prices that don't reflect local incomes. The
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This includes all "jumbo"markets most affected by an increase in conforming
mortgages which are mortgages greater thanmortgages would include: San Diego, San Jose,
$417,000. Loans are certainly available for theseRiverside, Orange County, Los Angeles, San Francisco,
borrowers, however, it must come from other sourcesand Sacramento.
of capital such as banks, credit unions, and mortgageThe downside of raising the limits should also be
companies that often sell large pools of mortgages toconsidered. For one, if you cause the value of real
investors. Historically, these loans would require ratesestate to increase based on lower interest rates, you
to be perhaps ¼% higher than conforming rates.make housing less affordable to people like cash
However, as investors lost a lot of money investing inbuyers that don't care about obtaining a loan.
mortgage backed securities that ended up being ofAdditionally, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae have faced
poor quality, they immediately required higher rates ofa number of operational and accounting problems in
return on new mortgages. Now, jumbo loans arerecent years, and they also do not have a history of
averaging about 1% higher interest rates thanexpertise in the jumbo loan market. Finally, you need to
conforming mortgages.ensure that you are not heavily focused on the size of
Some politicians and regulators feel that by raising theconforming loans while ignoring other factors such as
loan size limit placed on Fannie Mae and Freddie Macattracting additional investment capital to the mortgage
to as high as $729,500 in high cost areas, the value ofbacked securities market or dealing with people that
property would be positively affected, especially in highsimply cannot qualify for a loan in the house they are in
cost states like California. This is virtually an economicbecause they have negative equity or do not have the
certainty. Residential real estate historically sells basedincome to justify owning the home.
on debt ratios. Buyers were expected to spend no