| The Bush Administration put in place two Federal | | | | fourth year, HUD would get 70% or $14,000. If it was |
| Housing Administration programs which were | | | | refinanced or sold in the fifth year, HUD would get |
| supposed to help people facing foreclosure save their | | | | 60% or $12,000. If it was refinanced or sold after the |
| homes. | | | | fifth year, HUD would get 50% or $10,000. |
| The first was the FHA Secure Program. This was in | | | | On top of the Equity Sharing Provision there is an |
| effect from September 5, 2007 through December 31, | | | | Appreciation Sharing Provision. This stated that the |
| 2008. The program failed. It never helped the people it | | | | person getting the loan had to share 50% of any |
| was intended to. Only 4,000 out of about 400,000 | | | | increase in value of the property when the property |
| loans were refinanced. | | | | was sold or disposed of. This was the difference |
| The second program is the Hope For Homeowners | | | | between the value of the property at the time of sale |
| Program. This program is also supposed to certain | | | | or disposition and the appraised value at the time the |
| people facing foreclosure to save their homes by | | | | loan was taken out. Excluded from the appreciation |
| refinancing into FHA mortgages. These would have | | | | would be any closing costs and the cost for |
| lower interest rates and lower monthly payments | | | | improvements to the property. |
| which these people would be able to make. | | | | The equity and appreciation sharing provisions were |
| The Hope For Homeowners program went into effect | | | | very discouraging. Most people facing foreclosure |
| on October 1, 2008 and runs until September 30, 2011. | | | | would look at how much it was going to cost them to |
| Anyone with a loan taken out prior to January 1, 2008 | | | | get a loan under the Hope For Homeowners Program |
| who is facing foreclosure can apply to refinance under | | | | and decide that they were not much better off than |
| this program. | | | | they were in their current situation. |
| The FHA anticipated that 400,000 people either facing | | | | Lenders disliked the Hope For Homeowners Program |
| foreclosure or struggling to make their monthly | | | | too. The main reason is that they stood to lose a lot of |
| payments would be able to save their homes through | | | | money because of the program. |
| this program. The program was poorly written. Both | | | | The program said that the maximum amount for a |
| people facing foreclosure and their lenders disliked the | | | | loan under the program would be for 90% of the |
| program. | | | | current value of the home. That money would be paid |
| What were the reasons people facing foreclosure | | | | to the current lender. That lender would have to write |
| disliked the program? | | | | off the difference between that and what the person |
| With a regular FHA loan people have to pay for | | | | facing foreclosure owed on their loan. |
| mortgage insurance. At the start the amount of the | | | | Looking at this more closely. As an example we have |
| loan is increased by either 1.50% or 1.75% to cover the | | | | been using a home with a current value of $200,000 |
| upfront insurance. On a $200,000 loan, at 1.50% the | | | | and a loan under the Hope For Homeowners program |
| amount owed becomes $203,000. At 1.75% the | | | | of $180,000. Say the property has depreciated 25% in |
| amount owed becomes $203,500. | | | | value in the last year. It had been worth $266,000. The |
| In the Hope For Homeowners Program the upfront | | | | current balance on the loan is $240,000. The lender |
| insurance is 3.0%. That would increase the $200,000 | | | | would have to waive its right to collect the $60,000 |
| loan to $206,000. Any person getting this loan | | | | difference between the balance of the current loan |
| automatically loses more of the equity they have in | | | | and the new one of $180,000. |
| their home than they normally would with a traditional | | | | If there is a second loan on a home, the lender there |
| FHA loan. | | | | comes out worse. They have to release their lien on |
| On a normal FHA loan there is monthly insurance. The | | | | the property and accept whatever they are offered |
| charge for this is 0.50% each month. On the $203,000 | | | | as payment in full on their loan. |
| loan, the charge for this insurance is $84.58 monthly. | | | | Going back to the example we have been using. Say |
| In the Hope For Homeowners Program the monthly | | | | the property a year ago was worth $266,000. Instead |
| insurance is1.50%. On the $206,000 loan the monthly | | | | of one loan with a balance of $240,000, the balance |
| payment for the insurance is $257.50. | | | | on the first loan is $220,000. There is a balance of |
| It is assumed that the reason FHA increased the cost | | | | $20,000 on a second loan. When the home was |
| for the upfront and monthly insurance is simple. People | | | | purchased, this second loan was for $21,500. The |
| facing foreclosure are poorer risks. There would be a | | | | $180,000 from the new FHA loan would go to the |
| higher percentage of these people going back into | | | | lender on the first loan. The lender on the second loan |
| foreclosure. Therefore the premiums for the insurance | | | | would get nothing. |
| had to be increased to cover the risk. | | | | The program provides that lenders on second loans |
| The Hope For Homeowners Program also contained | | | | would be offered a share in future appreciation. |
| equity and appreciation sharing provisions. | | | | However, this would never be enough to cover the |
| The Equity Sharing provision stipulated that at the time | | | | loss they would incur. |
| the loan was being originated, the property would be | | | | The only ones who seem to benefit from the Hope |
| appraised. The person facing foreclosure would share | | | | For Homeowners Program as it was originally drafted |
| with the Department of Housing and Urban | | | | are FHA and HUD. People facing foreclosure lose. In |
| Development (HUD) a portion of the initial equity. If the | | | | addition their lenders are big losers too. |
| value was $200,000 and the loan was for 90% of that | | | | Thus far the Hope For Homeowners program has |
| or $180,000, there would be $20,000 in equity in the | | | | been a disaster. Only one person facing foreclosure |
| home. | | | | has refinanced their loan through the program. 51 more |
| If the person refinanced the loan or sold the home | | | | are being processed. Remember - when the program |
| within the first year, HUD would get 100% of the | | | | was announced, FHA anticipated that it would help |
| $20,000. If it was refinanced or sold in the second | | | | 400,000 people. |
| year, HUD would get 90% or $18,000. If it was | | | | Revisions to the program are being made. Perhaps |
| refinanced or sold in the third year, HUD would get | | | | these will help it become a program to help people |
| 80% or $16,000. If it was refinanced or sold in the | | | | save their homes. |